The DVD project I mentioned a couple blogs ago is still in
progress, but doesn’t fill every quiet moment, especially in bed at night waiting
for sleep to show up. An old fashioned book in hand still is preferable then.
Four recent reads:
Seriously Curious
is a collection of essays from The
Economist expanding on numerous facts and factoids. A few examples of
topics: How to measure the black market for cigarettes, why board games are so
popular in Nigeria, why there is a French argument over a new punctuation mark,
and why Swedes overpay their taxes. (The reason for the last one is negative
interest rates in Sweden, so it makes sense to overpay and get the overpayment
back later as a refund: in effect, a charge-free deposit.) The book is good for
the occasional distraction when there isn’t time to invest in something more
demanding.
**** ****
Washington in New York,
written by a local
historian who was kind enough to autograph a copy for me, covers
the busy first 1½ years (1789-90) of Washington’s Administration when New York
was the capital. (It had been the capital under the Articles of Confederation since
1785.) As part of a compromise over Hamilton’s financial plan, at the end of 1790 the capital was shifted temporarily to Philadelphia and then permanently to its current
site on the Potomac. I’ve read quite a lot of history of the Early Republic,
but I usually learn something new (or relearn something long since forgotten) from
every competent author who turns a hand to it, and that is the case here, too. For
example, Nisley notes the oft-overlooked importance of French economic
policy-maker Jacques Necker to Alexander Hamilton who was deeply influenced by
Necker’s memoirs. Regarding a less weighty matter, I once knew but had
forgotten (I had one of those “oh, yeah” moments) that Thanksgiving, which is
such a major holiday in the US today, was first declared a national holiday by
George Washington, though initially as a one-off event. It was re-declared
intermittently until Lincoln established it as an annual holiday. The New York
era was notable not only for what Congress and the President accomplished but
for what they failed to accomplish: to end slavery or at least chart a path
toward the end. Those interested in these key years of the Republic should
enjoy the book
**** ****
I posted about roboticist Daniel Wilson's clever tongue-in-cheek
How to Survive a Robot Uprising a
while back. Much of his advice was put to use in his subsequent novel Robopocalypse.
The upcoming robot uprising is well-trodden ground in scifi. It was the plot of
R.U.R. (1920) by Karel Čapek, who put
the word “robot” in the dictionary in the first place. That is OK. It is, after
all, the rare scifi novel with a premise that is altogether original. The
quality of the writing is what matters. Regrettably, that isn’t so much on
display in this work. Part of the problem is that the novel is written as a history
of the war against the sentient AI Archos (aka Rob), so we know from the outset
that the war was successful. The history is written as a series of vignettes of
participants in the war: British hackers, a Japanese engineer with an AI love
doll, Osage militia, etc. This would be OK, too, if we cared about any of these
people enough to wonder if they survived the conflict, but we don’t. Archos
decides humanity’s fate in much the same way as Skynet in
you-know-what-franchise, but withholds the nukes, which at least is sensible. Unleashing
nuclear weapons always seemed to me to be a bit hard on the infrastructure even
from Skynet's point of view; with robots and AIs (including self-driving cars,
cleaning robots, and even thermostats) in sufficient numbers, the humans are easily
targeted without them. The best hope for the humans’ survival is assistance
from friendly AIs – a direction Terminator:
The Sarah Connor Chronicles was plainly going when it was abruptly canceled
in its second season.
The novel is not terrible by any means; it’s just not
especially good. It is well-structured for cinematic adaptation, however, and
unsurprisingly it is in development for that with Chris Hemsworth cast in a
major role. Promisingly, the director is Drew Goddard (The Cabin in the Woods, Bad Times at the El Royale), so it might be
better on the screen than on the page.
**** ****
Victor Gischler writes rollicking good adventure tales and
fills them with humor and likable (or at least relatable) characters. His
preferred genres are crime (e.g. Gun
Monkeys) and science fiction (Go-Go
Girls of the Apocalypse). No Good Deed is closer to the
former, but is really in yet another category: a thriller delivered in his
characteristically witty prose. Francis, an ordinary and unimpressive guy with
a cubicle job in New York, has a bad start to his day when his girlfriend
leaves him. The day gets worse when he sees a suitcase in an alleyway. He picks
it up and emails a message to the address he found on a card inside the case saying that he has it – just
a minor good deed. At his job, where he is immediately dressed down by his boss
for being late, Emma, the owner of the case, shows up in green hair and combat
boots. Goons show up, too, and both Francis and Emma are in their crosshairs.
Francis is suddenly over his head in a cross-country adventure chased by the
NSA and by gun-wielding thugs working for Emma’s estranged husband, a brilliant
but neurotic tech billionaire in California who already has arranged for the
deaths of former employees with too much information. It’s all about a very
special AI algorithm, and Emma has a copy. Well-written and fun. Thumbs Up.
Mindi Abair
and the Boneshakers – No Good Deed Goes
Unpunished
I'd be interested in the movie Robopocalypse if it gets decent reviews. It sounds intriguing and I generally like robot stories. I've been trying to watch NOS4A2 on AMC but it seems too drawn out and I'm loosing interest.
ReplyDeleteI haven't gotten into NOS4A2 either despite its pretty good rating on imdb. Robopocalypse could be fun. We got a glimpse of ordinary machines (such as police cars) being subverted in Terminator 3, but a movie in which they are the primary antagonists has potential.
Delete