Every moment in history (or in an
individual life) is an inflection point. One always can point to a single choice
made by someone(s) somewhere that would have made a world of difference had it
been made the other way. Yet, some eras really are more stable than others – a more
momentous choice than usual would have to flip in order to make a real
difference. It is why our attention is more readily drawn to unstable eras when
things are unusually in flux; there are so many more obvious “if only” moments
when the touch of a finger could tip the outcome. The 1960s are one such era –
and not just for nostalgic Boomers narcissistically reminiscing about their
youths, though it’s hard to deny I am one of those. 1968 was a world apart from
1963 in popular culture, social mores, and public affairs. Those five years
really were revolutionary, but easily could have gone very differently for
better or for worse. The revolution was broader than five years, of course. “The
1960s” as we think of them had all of their roots in the 1950s and reached
their fullest expression in the 1970s, but the most glaring surface transformation
was smack in the middle of the ‘60s proper. Comic book author/artist Robert Crumb
probably didn’t affect the big picture of the decade very much even though in a
sense he painted it. In other words the social trends of the ‘60s would have
been little changed without him, but the visual representation of them would be
different and probably poorer. Then (as now) I was rarely in step with the times
and never ahead of them, so my first awareness of Robert Crumb was as the
artist who drew the cover of Cheap Thrills,
a must-have 1968 album by Big Brother and the Holding Company featuring Janis
Joplin. Fortunately, my sister was a couple years older than I and infinitely
hipper, so she then supplied me with underground comics by Crumb. I enjoyed
them but was not enough of a fan to seek out more and collect them.
One of Crumb’s recurring characters was
Fritz the Cat, who first appeared in 1959. The cat’s backstory was not always
the same. Sometimes he was a pretentious liberal arts student. Sometimes he was
an international spy. Sometimes he was a famous rock star. But always Fritz was
an obnoxious self-involved egotist in (despite the feline form) all too human
fashion. His real interests are sex, drugs, and rock’n’roll. Side characters deliberately,
ironically, and unabashedly exaggerate stereotypes of the day, whether racial,
social, or political. Why are the characters all animals? Crumb just felt freer
using them: “I can put more nonsense, more satire and fantasy into the animals.”
Nonetheless, as he mentions in a comic, they are “not unlike people in their
manners and morals.” Considering the era, Crumb’s vision of humanity is
ultimately a dark one: surface idealism and altruism have crass selfish
underpinnings in nearly all his characters. In 1972 legendary animator Ralph Bakshi
produced the movie Fritz the Cat,
which mashes up storylines from a few comics but mostly relies on “Fritz Bugs
Out.” Fritz in the film version is a college student who is far less
intellectual than he thinks, and whose ideological rhetoric encourages a riot
that turns him into a fugitive. Oh, yes: the cartoon is X-rated. The movie was
a box office success, but Robert Crumb hated it. He hated it so much that he
killed off Fritz in the comics in 1972 in order to discourage a sequel. (It
didn’t work: the sequel The Nine Lives of
Fritz the Cat was produced anyway.) None of this had crossed my mind in a
very long time until a couple weeks ago when I stumbled across an online
reference to CoolWorld (I no longer remember where),
another Bakshi animation from 1992. Though it had nothing to do with Crumb, the
reference brought him to mind anyway and prompted me to look him up on Amazon.
The collection The Life and Death of
Fritz the Cat caught my eye and a few days later it arrived at the door. It
contains tales from Fritz’ first 1959 appearance to his untimely 1972 death.
Someone reading Crumb for the first time is likely to ask the same question as
a first time viewer of the movie: Is this an homage to its era or a venomous
send-up of it? The answer is yes. It is both.
Is there any relevance in the Fritz
comics to the 2020s? Perhaps, at least if we consider what a similarly
representative comic about our own time would look like. If the comic is honest
the answer to the same question surely again would be yes. And in half a
century folks will ponder what would have happened if this person or that in
2022 simply had made another choice.
I enjoy Crumb's cartooning over his stories most of the time, and a lot of his work sort of gets into a sexy, perv-y area that might have slightly appealed to me when I was younger, and he pushed envelopes. But now I prefer his more auto bio stuff or later work. Still I can't say his stories work for me that much. But I'll give him his due.
Crumb was very much of his time. It’s hard to imagine his comics getting any traction at all had they first appeared in, say, the 1940s or after 1980. Still, the envelopes he pushed needed pushing.
I enjoy Crumb's cartooning over his stories most of the time, and a lot of his work sort of gets into a sexy, perv-y area that might have slightly appealed to me when I was younger, and he pushed envelopes. But now I prefer his more auto bio stuff or later work. Still I can't say his stories work for me that much. But I'll give him his due.
ReplyDeleteCrumb was very much of his time. It’s hard to imagine his comics getting any traction at all had they first appeared in, say, the 1940s or after 1980. Still, the envelopes he pushed needed pushing.
Delete