Every book – or movie for that matter – is a product of its
time, and never more glaringly so than when it is “ahead of its time.” This is
especially manifest in science fiction where every laudatory response of the
type “Wow, I can’t believe this was written back in 1957” will be paired with a
headshaking “Wow, this was written in 1957, alright.” The imaginative,
freethinking, and socially unconventional HG Wells, for example, is nonetheless
deeply grounded in +-1900 in ways that were invisible to himself. His
unconventionality is very much of a Victorian/Edwardian brand. As a screen
example, the otherwise groundbreaking Forbidden
Planet is infused with 1950s sexual dynamics. The best works rise above
their time even while remaining rooted in it, however, by revealing constant
truths – truths which may be publically discussed in some eras, but only
whispered in others. It is currently fashionable not to make allowances for
past mores that are unacceptable today – a judgmental fashion that no doubt itself
will cause eye rolls among our descendants – but one gets the most out of older
fiction by doing so. That applies to one novel on my nightstand this past
weekend; it is enjoyable if read in the context of its publication date.
Scifi master Philip Jose Farmer published Flesh in 1968, the high water mark of
the counterculture that was so integral to the decade 1965 to 1974. The book arrived from Amazon on Friday. As you might imagine
there is not much social distancing in it. (An earlier shorter version came out
in 1960, but he rewrote it extensively in 1968.) It is very much of its era. And yet, it is much older, too.
A starship crew has sought out and found new habitable
worlds. Thanks to sleep stasis and time dilation, they are not much older than
when they left although 800 years have passed on earth. They return to a widely
depopulated post-apocalyptic world on which technology is no more than 17th
century (sail and animal power) in every way but biology: a religious order is
quite skilled at bioengineering. The North American Eastern Seaboard is divided
into several entities including Caseyland (New England), Deecee (New York to
Virginia), Pants-Elf (Pennsylvania), and Karelia (a Finnish colony bracketing the
others to north and south). The societies differ significantly but they play
each other in a deadly variety of baseball. The balls are steel with spikes, the
bats have metal plates, and it is perfectly legal for the pitcher to kill the
batter (or a runner) by hitting him with the ball if he can. Casualties are
expected.
The ship lands in the former city of Washington in Deecee.
The crew discovers a pagan society dedicated to a fertility cult of the triple
White Goddess (manifested by the waxing, full, and waning moon) whom they call
Columbia. (They assume the White House is dedicated to her.) While men occupy many
prominent secular offices (with titles such as John Barleycorn and Tom
Tobacco), they are just executing the policies of the priestesses in this
fundamentally matriarchal society. Arriving shortly before the winter solstice,
the starship captain, whose name happens to be Stagg, is modified with antlers
that hormonally influence him to behave according to his intended role as the
year’s designated sun-king (having actually arrived out of the sky) in Deecee’s
central mythology. The crew at first think they have landed amidst a free love
free-for-all, but they have not. The orgiastic goings-on are ritualistic, which
is not the same thing – they are a seasonal rite. The book interweaves the
stories of three crewmembers (one of them Stagg) who try to make sense of and
survive in the new world.
Philip Jose Farmer clearly was strongly influenced by Robert
Graves’ 1948 book The White Goddess – and also by Frazer and
Campbell though Graves seems to have had the biggest impact. The White
Goddess is a rewarding read, though a difficult one for anyone not well-grounded
in (at the very least) classical mythology and preferably Celtic as well. Robert
Graves (classicist, poet, novelist – author of I, Claudius) argues (as does Frazer) that Neolithic (i.e. farming,
but pre-urban and pre-copper) or earlier peoples throughout northern Europe,
the Middle East, and the Mediterranean basin shared similar fundamentally
matriarchal religions based on the seasons and the cycle of birth, life, and
death. Their rituals involved a chosen sun-king who was either figuratively or
literally sacrificed at the solstice under the auspices of the Triple Goddess
(maiden, matron, crone) represented by the moon. Elements of this primal myth underlie
later more masculinized mythologies of early civilizations; they are there to
be uncovered if you look for them as are the ways in which they were
transformed by the rise of warrior states. He looks for them, finds them, discusses
the evolution of mythology from earlier to later forms, and additionally
comments on such matters as tree alphabets and pre-literate numbering systems
that had occult significance. He further argues these elements are still
embedded in our culture (however obscurely) and that all true poetry (not
everything that scans is poetry) figuratively or literally expresses some
aspect of this most ancient myth:
“My thesis is that the language of poetic myth anciently
current in the Mediterranean and Northern Europe was a magical language bound
up with popular religious ceremonies in honour of the Moon-goddess, or Muse, some
of them dating from the Old Stone Age, and that this remains the language of
true poetry.”
Anthropologists differ on the value of Grave’s analysis.
Some dismiss it outright as wholly imaginary, some find the evidence
(admittedly interpretative) for it compelling, while others are agnostic since
at this distance in time there is no way to prove or disprove the thesis. Something
about it seems right to many readers though, for the book has been influential
on historians, psychologists, major literary figures as well as pop culture authors
such as Farmer, and practitioners of the pagan revival including Wicca. As to
whether priestesses of Columbia will be grafting antlers onto sun-kings’ heads
in our future, I guess we’ll have to wait 800 years to find out.
Creedence
Clearwater Revival - Pagan Baby
I could probably read and enjoy the former book over the latter one. But a good review nonetheless. Stagg, ha ha. It amusing me and as well bewilders me that some people let certain thing keep them from either watching or enjoying a film, book, etc. For example, watching a film in black and white, or one that lacks contemporary special effects to mores of that day, which some might be racism or misogamy. (I get that some of that is not politically correct now, nor should it be. I'm just saying that it shouldn't impede one's enjoyment or be an obstacle to peruse anything.)
ReplyDeleteYes, the B&W thing is a surprisingly big stumbling block for many people. I was about to say “young” people but it’s been true for decades so “middle-age” people, too. There is also a resistance to movies in the old aspect ratios – which were the same as the old TV dimensions. That’s the ratio with which most films were projected onto movie house screens right into the 1950s, but even TCM airs them anamorphic instead even though that means distorting the images or cropping them top and bottom. To be contrary (and also for artistic reasons) Stanley Kubrick, to the annoyance of many, filmed “Eyes Wide Shut” in the old ratio.
DeleteBut content always is rooted in time. That is one reason to watch or read it. Just as we benefit from travel to experience different cultures (even if we don’t like all aspects of them), we benefit from experiencing the cultures of different times, too. LP Hartley: “The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there.”