The following comments were not pre-planned for October, but by chance they
are seasonally appropriate. A couple months ago after finishing Matt Haig’s
scifi novel The Humans (see my August
6 review) I opened his earlier book The
Radleys. The Radleys are a middle class suburban family who are Abstainers
– not from alcohol but from blood. They are vampires, you see. I finished the
book in a few days, but decided to pair a review with one of a TV series with similar
night creatures. The critically well-regarded series Angel will be 20 years old in 2019. Somehow during all those years
I ignored it thoroughly, but, in the way that one thought leads to another, The Radleys brought it to mind and prompted
a belated look. The series lasted 5 seasons, and there are limits to my binge
watching tendencies, so only now am I done with it.
First, The Radleys. I know
what you’re thinking. Actually, I don’t but I can guess: “Not another book about vampires. You know it’s
been done.” Yes it has, but this is worth a read anyway. Haig’s vampires crave
blood the way an addict craves a drug, but they don’t actually need it. They
lose all their special abilities (including supernormal longevity) if they
abstain, but some do anyway for ethical reasons. There is an Abstainer’s
Handbook that reads like a 12-step program. Abstainers can live more or less
normal lives and even go out in daytime if they wear enough sunblock.
Peter and Helen Radley left the London nightlife behind in order to
raise a family. They are Abstainers residing in the Yorkshire village of
Bishopthorpe on Orchard Lane. They raise no suspicions from the neighbors of
being anything other than a bit quirky. Their teen children Rowan and Clara are
vampires, too, but they don’t know it. In fact they don’t know anything about
the family vampirism; they have been told that their photosensitivity is an
inherited medical condition, as in a sense it is. Peter and Helen maintain this
prevarication even as Clara makes herself sick with a vegan diet that is unhealthy
to vampiric metabolism. When a drunk boy gets pushy with Clara during her walk
back from a party, however, her fangs come out for the first time. Instinct
takes over. She kills the boy, drains his blood, and is physically and mentally
transformed. The lives of the whole family are upended by Clara’s act of
homicide, by the subsequent family revelations, and by the sudden risk of
exposure. Peter Radley calls on his emphatically non-abstaining brother Will to
help with the family crisis, apparently unaware that Will and Helen share a
secret about Rowan. Will, however, attracts the interest of authorities and of a
vigilante.
The Radleys’ embattled vampiric drives are described not just in the
terms of addiction but (not coincidentally) much in the same way Freud
describes the animal drives we all have and repress in order to be civilized. (See
Civilization and Its Discontents by
Sigmund Freud.) We do this with varying degrees of success, and if we are too
successful we make ourselves sick, as did the Radleys for so many years. The adult
Radleys encounter crises, choices, and betrayals of a sort that are largely
ordinary, if one allows for the vampire element, and these things get their due
satiric treatment. The true focus of the novel, though, is the struggle faced
by Rowan and Clara with adolescence, told through the metaphor of vampirism. Their
young lives are enhanced by discovering and accepting what they are, but at the
same time this poses dangers. It is one thing to know oneself and another fully
to act out all one's desires. Part of growing up, they learn, is “knowing which secrets need
keeping.”
Haig has written a funny and clever book. Thumbs Up.
Next up: Angel (1999-2004),
created by Joss Whedon and David Greenwalt, stars David Boreanaz, the fellow
from Bones and Seal Team. Boreanaz’ first big break came in 1997 when he was cast
as the 240-year-old vampire Angel in Buffy
the Vampire Slayer (1997-2003). Angel, unlike other vampires, has a soul
due to a curse by Gypsies back in 1898. A “soul” in Whedon terms is a moral
compass, so Angel is as capable of regret and self-recrimination as normal
people. (Normal vampires are guilt-free sociopaths.) Accordingly, he chooses
not to hunt people for dinner anymore, which on the whole makes him a better
date for Buffy (Sarah Michelle Gellar) than otherwise would be the case. In the
final episode of Buffy Season 3 in
1999, Angel leaves Buffy and Sunnydale for Los Angeles – and for his own
spin-off TV show Angel.
It is not necessary to be a fan of Buffy
to watch Angel, but it helps. Buffy fans already understand the
backstories of several characters. Cordelia and Wesley, characters in the first
three seasons of Buffy, are regulars
on Angel, and there are appearances
(some in flashbacks, some in crossover episodes) by other Buffy characters including Darla, Drusilla, Spike, Buffy, Faith,
and Willow. Though the two shows take place in the same Buffyverse, there are
differences in how the para-world is presented in each. In Sunnydale only a
handful of people are aware that vampires, werewolves, demons, and the like are
real; Buffy and her small circle of allies therefore are pretty much on their
own in combatting them. In Los Angeles the demons are much more in the open and
a sizeable minority of people are aware of them and interact with them
regularly. (There is a cheap shot at L.A. in there somewhere.) Angel, Cordelia,
and Wesley operate a detective agency specializing in cases where those
paranormal interactions with humans go bad. Whereas Buffy is a show that metaphorically is about growing up, Angel is about the ongoing trials of
life once you’ve done that. What if you never watched an episode of Buffy? You’ll miss “in” references, but
the show still works on its own; only rarely (as in the season 1 “Five by Five”
episode when Faith comes to town) would an absence of familiarity with Buffy make a character somewhat
puzzling.
Joss Whedon likes to genre-bend and genre-blend. Angel is a film-noir/horror/comedy. It’s actually not the first
such mix in a TV series: Kolchak: The Night Stalker back in the 1970s had
just this combination. What Kolchak
didn’t have was character evolution, multi-episode story arcs, and meaningful
themes. (Kolchak had more of a
“monster of the week” format.) Joss Whedon just can’t help waxing philosophical
even at his silliest, and his taste for existentialism informs Angel as it does Buffy. The show is better for it. There also are thoughts about
corporatism and how it affects private ethics in the evil law firm (the reader
can decide if that is redundant) Wolfram and Hart. The show can be sentimental,
gruesome, and funny at the same time. Its characters range from baldly credible
to colorfully fanciful – including a demon who owns a karaoke bar. The result
isn’t Buffy, but it’s not bad. Yet
another Thumbs Up.
Vampires persist in the lore of our popular culture and
don’t seem to be going away anytime soon. The prevailing explanation is that
they allow us to express our hidden impulses through them. The sexual aspects
of vampires have been understood from the beginning – bisexual, one might note,
since they are open-minded about their victims. In much of the 19th
and 20th centuries guilt over fantasies that were at variance with traditional
morality could be lessened by employing fictional creatures to explore them. In
the 21st century guilt about violating PC morality (just as
puritanical in its own way) can be assuaged in the same manner. In a broader
sense, we can see vampires and other monstrous creatures as our own dark sides.
Carl Jung talked about the shadow: the part of the personality that is wild,
dark, and savage. Jung believed that only by acknowledging and coming to terms
with one’s shadow – rather than just denying its existence or projecting it on
to others – can one truly be healthy. The Radleys and Angel manage to do it in
fiction. Perhaps they can help us do it for real.
Stevie Lange – Remember
The Radleys sounds like a good book, and would make a good TV show if handled properly. I remember Angel back in the day. While I was working I couldn't keep up with Buffy no less Angel. I'm sure it did well with Buffy fans though.
ReplyDeleteDo you remember a TV show back in the day, I believe the late 80s called Werewolf? I remember it stared Chuck Conners as the evil werewolf, and a young actor playing the reluctant twenty-something werewolf, and a werewolf hunter trying to rid the world of him and other werewolves.
ReplyDeleteThat was a very good show, for the low budget series that it was. Fox was trying to get a footing as a fourth broadcast network at the time and had come out with some off-beat shows like Werewolf, The New Adventures of Beans Baxter, and Married with Children. All were interrupted by the writers strike of '88 and most, including Werewolf, didn't recover. Apparently it was on DVD but Amazon currently lists it as unavailable.
Delete