“Noir” originally
described a type of movie especially prevalent in the 40s and 50s. You know the
ones: This Gun for Hire, Out of the Past,
The Big Sleep, Double Indemnity, Kiss Me Deadly, etc. They feature sleaze,
lowlife, crime, corrupt cops, and wisecracking dames. The protagonist is
cynical: often a disillusioned former idealist. The villain is worse only by
degree. The term later was back-applied to the books on which so many of the
movies were based: books by the likes of Dashiell Hammett, Raymond Chandler,
and Jim Thompson.
The style of writing
and filmmaking persists (neo-noir), but it was so well suited to its initial
decades that a deft hand is required to make it work in the 21st
century. Too easily the result can resemble parody. It can be done, and is done,
but one way to ease the process is to set the work in the 40s and 50s. This
approach was taken in a book by Christopher Moore released last month and by Michael
Winterbottom in his 2010 film adaptation of Jim Thompson’s 1952 book The Killer inside Me.
**** ****
Noir by Christopher Moore
I’ve long liked
Christopher Moore’s satiric style, so that alone was enough reason to consider buying
his latest book. Set in 1947 San Francisco, the novel’s on-the-money homage to noir
clinched the sale. Moore captures the patter of the genre. This actually
concerns him somewhat: before the text proper, Moore asks the reader’s
indulgence for the book’s era-appropriate un-PC dialogue. (Frankly, most – not
all – of it is refreshing.)
Sammy isn’t anyone
special and his moral code is flexible. He chooses not to mention that his bad
foot isn’t a war injury as everyone assumes; in reality it had kept him out of
the service. He falls hard for the to-die-for shapely war widow Stilton (“like
the cheese”) who chooses not to mention that (for her at least) her status is
not so tragic. Sammy is no detective Philp Marlowe and Stilton is no heiress Vivian
Rutledge; he’s a bartender and she’s a waitress. When he and “the Cheese” find
themselves embroiled in murder, corrupt police, renegade federal agents, snake
venom, and a secret organization of one-percenters, the two must punch
seriously above their weights to survive. Unexpectedly, behind all the
commotion is a mysterious event that took place in Roswell, New Mexico.
The novel has good
action, good drama, unlikely twists, dual narratives, and shameless sentiment.
It is funny without descending into full-on parody. Thumbs Up.
**** ****
The Killer
inside Me (2010)
I read Jim Thompson’s
book decades ago. A 1976 screen adaptation was not very well done, so I was
curious to see if this one was more successful. I’ve caught snippets of it here
and there, but only last week did I finally watch it through.
Deputy Sherriff Lou
Ford (Casey Affleck) hides his calculated sociopathy and sexual depravity by
affecting a folksy dullness in a 1950s West Texas town. He is well-liked in town
and by his respectable girlfriend Amy (Kate Hudson) whom he keeps as part of
his smokescreen. However, when his sadism is matched by the masochism of the
prostitute Joyce (Jessica Alba), the brutal violence depicted is not the comic
book variety one sees in Kingsman or Kill Bill! It is vile, base, degraded,
and all too credible.
Lou sets up a scene at
Joyce’s house to look like Joyce and her customer/lover young Conway killed
each other. He does this for amusement because young Conway’s father is someone
against whom Lou holds a grudge. The outcome of the movie depends on whether
Lou’s set-up holds up under investigation.
Disturbing, but Thumbs
Up.
The Moore Noir sounded pretty good. There was a foreign adaption of The Killer Inside Me as well, called Coup de Torchon (1981) that was pretty well made, but lacked the Americana aspects that one would expect from a Thompson novel. If taken on its own, it's a pretty decent movie. For whatever reason the Afflect film didn't get very good reviews, but like you, I enjoyed it well enough.
ReplyDeleteWondered if you know any good evil robot books/stories? The only one I can think of is The Humanoids by Jack Williamson--sort of an evil robot alien invasion, and the short story by P K Dick, Second Variety. The robots here aren't the typical, in the shape of the human figure variety, but pretty lethal.
While I assume many of the naysayers truly didn’t like the movie, I also that I think in any time and place are certain themes and plot elements that make some reviewers hesitant to praise a movie; the list of themes and elements will change along with the culture. This one ticks several of the present-day boxes.
ReplyDeleteMoore is usually a good read and he is in good form with this one.
Evil robots… From classic SF, there are the Berserkers stories and novels of Fred Saberhagen. Robotic self-replicating spacefaring AI machines are out to destroy all life. The short story collection “Berserker” from 1967 is a good one. More recently, robots (evil and otherwise) are the only characters in “Saturn’s Children” by Charles Stross; actual humans have died out and humaniform robots remain. They don’t change thir human-like characteristics because that would alter their sense of identity. I wrote a couple short stories myself, though the “evil” of the robots is a matter of perspective: Circuits Circus and Going Through the Motions
Moore is a really good writer. His novel "Lamb" and the follow up novella "The Stupidest Angel" are a real hoot. Need to check this one out. Sounds like a blast. Been enjoying some Chandler lately, so this should fit the bill.
ReplyDeleteI heard about "the Killer Inside me" and it sounds like a dark and disturbing film. But it got some really solid reviews. I've popped it back on my "to see" list after your additional recommendation.
"Noir" is definitely good fun.
ReplyDeleteJim Thompson is hard to bring to the screen since so much of his novels is in the heads of the characters. "The Grifters" was an
impressive adaptation though, and this one works pretty well, too.