I saw 2018 arrive in my
favorite place and state: at home, warm, and dry – dry in beverage sense. The
hangover cures that peppered newspapers and net sites on and shortly before New
Year’s Day were of pleasantly little personal interest. Besides, there are no
cures. There are minor palliatives at best. Hangovers ultimately have to wear
off on their own, and (ceteris paribus)
this takes longer for some people than for others. I’m one of those for whom it
takes longer. Frank Sinatra once remarked, “I feel sorry for people who don't
drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to
feel all day.” In my case the morning after bibulation is as bad as I’ll feel
all day – sometimes the next day, too. The usual supposed preventatives (hydration,
fatty foods, white liquors only, etc.) make little or no difference to me. (Yes,
moderation is always an option, but the topic is excess.)
I’m not virtue-signaling. I
like a good buzz as much as anyone. Alcohol accordingly was something of a
hobby for me in my 20s. The hangovers were not milder then. In that decade I
simply was more willing to accept the price for the nights before. I have no
judgments to make about those who still are, or who pay lower prices as a
matter of course. By my 30s, however, for no other reason than pain avoidance I
had tapered back to an annual intake about equal to the CDC’s suggested maximum
for a week (14 drinks). Yet, even
now I can see wisdom in Raymond Chandler’s advice: "A man ought to get
drunk at least twice a year just on principle, so he won't let himself get
snotty about it." Twice has been about my number in recent years. It’s enough
to remind myself why I don’t indulge the other 363 days, and also enough to
remind myself why so many people do. There is much to be said be said for the
night before. We all are aware of the risks and downsides (some potentially
lethal) to the night before, but there is still much to be said for it. My preferred
tipple on those two days: Wild Turkey 101, a flavorful moderately priced
bourbon that, at 101 proof (50.5% alcohol), achieves its intended effect
expeditiously and with no worse (albeit no better) aftereffects than any other pick.
The intended effect is a change
in perspective: an altered state that can be revealing. (Altered states can be
achieved without extraneous chemicals, btw, but that is for another
discussion.) The ancient Persians who, according to Herodotus, considered every
important question both sober and drunk before making a decision may have been
onto something. I suspect, though, that the significance of that story got
turned around in Herodotus’ colorful retelling. I suspect that it was less a
matter of sober Persians saying, “Let’s see what I think about this drunk” and
more a matter of drunks saying, “Let’s see what I think about this sober.” I
think the good sense of the latter is self-evident.
What brings all this to mind,
besides the time of year, is a re-watch with a friend last week of Joss
Whedon’s 2012 version of Much Ado about Nothing, a remarkable side-project shot in 12
days with B&W handheld cameras at his own home. During the first viewing I
didn’t pay much attention to how much the characters drink, which is a lot. Yet,
their intemperance was an inspired directorial choice. The characters, after
all, don’t make very sober judgments, so it makes eminent sense for them to be not
sober. This is unlike so many movies in which characters seem weirdly
unaffected by drinking: e.g. Nick Charles, who retains his sharp deductive
skills despite awe-inspiring consumption in the Thin Man movies; James Bond, who remains quick of wit and reflex
despite those shaken-not-stirred vodka martinis; and the Western gunfighter of
your choice who is as sure a shot as ever despite guzzling whiskey in the
saloon.
On second viewing I recommend Much Ado about Nothing even more
heartily than after the first. It may be the most accessible Shakespeare film in decades. I recommend seeing it sober though. Well, once anyway. Persian
fashion would work, too.
WC Fields’ debt: clip from Never Give a Sucker an Even Break
My most recommend Shakespeare film might be Shakespeare in Love. A lot of people didn't care for the film, but I think if one enjoys romantic films, it's a pretty good one.
ReplyDeleteYes, actually I think I sleep better without indulging, which is not to say that I don't ever. Like you said, it's good to take a nip ever so often for the reasons you cited. I used to get pretty bad hangovers too and that's with just a few beers, not less spirits. I think some of that might be due to my allergies. I still think marijuana should be legalized. I find that it is better for sleep inducement, no calories, and sometimes it does help (at least for me) with all sorts off odd maladies that alcohol just compound or would not work. Not bad for a hangover either.
Yes, I remember “Shakespeare in Love” got rave reviews when it came out in ’98. For the past 20 years the thought intermittently has occurred to me that it is a film I should see someday. I suppose two decades is a sufficient delay.
DeleteI’m on board with marijuana legalization, too. Actually, since counterculture days I’ve been pro-legalization across the spectrum. I’m not personally a pothead and never was – not even in the days when I had to walk through a haze of smoke to get to my dorm room. I just never liked it, but I’ve seen it do a lot of good for a lot of people: more good than Valium ever did. Even if it didn’t, though, I still wouldn’t be inclined to choose for others in the matter. I also think raising the drinking age to 21 was a mistake on multiple levels. I know many argue that it has saved lives, yet direct and indirect fatalities from alcohol (primarily in auto accidents) have gone down just as much in countries where the age has remained 18 (e.g. Canada, UK, and Australia) as they have in the US, so other factors than legal status seem to be responsible.
Be that as it may, I do personally like C2H6O, as I wrote in the blog, but the prospect of the next day is a real deterrent. I can feel a single glass of wine the next day – not as a hangover exactly, but I still can feel it and would rather not. So, I can relate to your beer moderation.
Not stating that I still indulge in marijuana--my job was a cure for that, however, I've felt bad at times and thought if this were legal, and readily available, I wouldn't mind alleviating some pain. There can be a hangover effect somewhat with it too, so if you want a clear day, best to not do anything. I know it is currently being used for some medical treatments, it could help perhaps with the opiod crisis, though with our current administration, I'm not expecting much.
ReplyDeleteI didn't imagine you were smoking up east Texas.
Delete:) Changing topics, wondered if you'd read any Bukowski (or beat writers, although he's a bit post beat), or Harvey Pekar, or Joe R. Lansdale?
ReplyDeleteYes, lowlife needs chroniclers as much as (or more than) the world of the beautiful people. I’ve sampled Bukowski here and there, most recently his quasi-autobiographical “Ham on Rye”, which certainly isn’t self-flattering. My favorite author whose focus is on unsavory folks is still Jim Thompson, whose noir-ish novels (mostly from the 50s) are hard to beat. Lansdale mixes horror and humor well; Jack Ketchum is my favorite current horror writer, though Robert Bloch (“Psycho”) is my favorite of all time. I recommend Bloch's collected short stories for some wicked and funny nighttime reading. I’m aware of Pekar, but haven’t sampled much.
Delete