Dystopian fiction predates the First
World War, but the 1914-18 cataclysm gave it a huge boost. Modern industrial
society had unleashed its own deadly technology on itself in a way scarcely
anyone had believed possible, killing millions and brutalizing millions more. (Scarcely anyone: HG Wells in his 1913
novel The World Set Free writes of an
atomic war and its aftermath.) The rise of unabashedly authoritarian regimes
around the world in the years following the war did nothing to assuage fears.
Future dystopias seemed much more ominously credible than they had before
August 1914. Books and film have been rife with them ever since.
Typically a dystopic tale takes the
perspective of a fairly ordinary person (albeit sometimes an offspring of
someone important) who becomes a rebel more by happenstance than intent. He or
she then struggles against the power structure until final victory or defeat,
according to the whim of the author: Metropolis,
Brave New World, 1984, etc. A rash of recent entries is aimed specifically at
young adults: The Hunger Games, Divergent, The Maze Runner, and so on.
In an article in The Guardian, Ewan Morrison complained
that these recent entries are libertarian propaganda. There is something to
this, whether or not it is intended by the authors (I doubt it), and whether or
not one shares Ewan’s objections to it (I don’t). An example of what he means is
the brutal suppression of the Black Market in District 12 by the thugs from the
capital in The Hunger Games; the
illegal free market had helped make the lives of the residents bearable, which
puts free markets in a sympathetic light. Arguably this subtext is almost
inevitable: rebellion can be only against authority. Nonetheless, a few authors
have managed to escape it by narrowing their ideological targets. Margaret
Atwood did this in her 1985 A Handmaid’s
Tale, which was made into a movie in 1990 that received very mixed reviews.
Written at a time when the Moral
Majority was making a lot of noise, A
Handmaid’s Tale envisions a future in which the US is under the boot of a
radical and murderous Christian theocracy that makes the Taliban look sweet,
gentle, and moderate. Due to the effects of pollution in the “Republic of
Gilead,” most women are sterile. Those who are not are held in sexual slavery;
a “handmaid” is a surrogate breeder for a bigwig’s sterile wife. Reviews of
both book and movie, as one might imagine, tend to track the religious politics
of the reviewer. Regardless of how one feels about the message, though, Atwood
crafts a good tale with well-honed English that is a pleasure to read. She
shows an easy familiarity with Western classical culture that is increasingly
uncommon among the presumably educated.
There is another attraction to
dystopian fiction besides unease about the general future of the world. There
is unease about the future of our individual selves. Dystopian novels can be
metaphors for this. Ultimately, we all face aging and death; it is hard to get
more dystopian than that. Atwood also dealt with this directly in her most
recent collection of stories, Stone
Mattress. My experience with her earlier work prompted me to read it over
the past few days.
At 75, Margaret is more reflective
than ever about mortality. In the nine tales of Stone Mattress, many of her characters are in the last
decade of their lives (barring major actuarial anomalies). They face not just current
day to day challenges but the unresolved issues of their past, which are
resurfacing precisely because the time to resolve them has or soon will run out.
In the first story Constance is a frail white-haired author of a popular
fantasy series called Alphinland. Constance faces a hero’s journey: a harrowing nighttime walk to the corner
store and back in snow and ice during a power outage. She has mental
conversations with her deceased husband and complicated lingering feelings
about Gavin, the love of her youth. Gavin was a self-involved poet who carelessly
cheated on her with a young woman named Marjorie. Gavin and Marjorie, unknown
to either, exist in Alphinland; Constance trapped them respectively in a wine
cask and a beehive. In the next two tales Gavin and then Marjorie are the
primary characters, both also aged and reflective. Other tales vary in style.
There is one about a girl with a genetic disorder that turns her into a
vampire-like monster. The eponymous tale is of a woman’s late but just (if not
legal) revenge. In the final tale “Torching the Dusties,” Wilma in her
retirement community is beset not only by imaginary little people but by an all
too real violent youth group called Our Turn whose members are furious at the
outsized consumption of scarce resources by the old.
Once again, Atwood’s work is
superbly written and wonderfully atmospheric. Stone Mattress may not make you
feel better about your future, but it will make the present more enjoyable.
That counts for something.
Margaret on the beginning of the lane: the influence of childhood fairy tales:
Interesting interview with Atwood, she's pretty articulate. I've seen the movie of The Handmaid's Tale, but haven't read the book. With her talking about the Brother's Grimm, it makes me want to read some of those stories. Funny that as kids we are drawn to the macabre, and some of us still enjoy that sort of thing. I wonder if this current crop of dystopian tales have been fueled after the event of 9-11 or perhaps it's more just a trend?
ReplyDeleteThe unabridged edition is worth owning, and, yes, it is rather sanguinary. Snow White and the prince force the Evil Queen to dance in red hot iron shoes until she dies. In Briar Rose (aka Sleeping Beauty), the prince doesn’t awaken anybody; he just opportunistically moves in on a good thing just as the 100 year curse is ending by itself. Not just the Grimms are grim: Andersen’s Little Mermaid, for example, commits suicide. I suppose the dystopias do arrive in waves, though they never quite go away.
Delete