Mini-reviews of six midnight home double-features follow. I’ve
continued my lately acquired pattern of pairing a newly viewed film with an
older one of which the first reminded me.
** ** ** **
**
Factotum (2005) – Charles Bukowski
is one of those writers who is very
good at what he does, but who leaves a disagreeable aftertaste. Ultimately, the
problem is snobbery. Snobbery is not confined to the upper classes. There is a
working class version. There also is the snobbery of the bad boy who looks down
his nose at anyone less hard-drinking and hell-raising. Bukowski is no stranger
to both kinds. For all that, he remains a good read. The movie Factotum, based on Bukowski’s book of
the same title, shares many of the book’s faults and virtues. Hank Chinaski,
played by Matt Dillon, is a thinly veiled version of Bukowski himself. Hank is
a commercially unsuccessful writer who spends his life drinking, gambling, and
womanizing, inevitably with women who also have drinking problems. Just to earn
the bare minimum amount to live, Hank works at a series of meaningless menial
jobs though he always gets fired for drinking or slacking. About his writing,
though, he has artistic integrity. In short he is a drunk with literary
pretentions. The movie leaves a disagreeable aftertaste. For all that, it is a
good watch.
The Philadelphia Story (1940) – When
asked to name my all-time favorite movie, I’ll give one of several answers
according to my mood, but The
Philadelphia Story always is in the running. Tracy Lord (Katherine Hepburn)
has divorced Dexter (Cary Grant) after a short tempestuous marriage, and now
plans to marry the self-made nouveau
riche George (John Howard), who lacks not only the easy grace of old money
but its relaxed morality. In fact, George is steeped in out-of-place bourgeois
values. A tabloid newspaper sends reporter Macaulay and photographer Elizabeth
(Jimmy Stewart and Ruth Hussey) to cover the high society marriage.
How could a film centered on the romances of the
uber-rich possibly have been called to mind by Factotum? It was Jimmy Stewart’s role. The sometimes drunken writer
Macaulay is so self-satisfied in his disdain for the privileged class that
Tracy calls him out for being a snob: “You're the worst kind there is. An
intellectual snob. You made up your mind awfully young, it seems to me.” Throw
in a precocious younger sister to Tracy, an ebrious old uncle with a taste for
chorus girls, and dialogue that is intelligent, sophisticated, and funny, and
you have a movie classic.
** ** ** **
**
Neighbors (2014) – Mac and Kelly Radner
(Seth Rogan and Rose Byrne) have a new baby and new neighbors in their suburban
neighborhood. The neighbors are a college fraternity with a reputation for
legendary parties. The frat’s leader arranges a modus vivendi with the couple; the Radners agree to voice
complaints directly to him instead of to the police, and he agrees to take any
complaints seriously. When no one answers the frat’s phone during one noisy party-night,
however, Mac calls the police anyway. Feeling betrayed, the frat boys
retaliate. The feud escalates. Given the actors and the premise, you probably
have a pretty good idea of what sort of comedy this is. You’re right. The pervasive
potty humor is tiresome rather than offensive, but I have to assume it
resonates with much of the intended audience. There are some genuinely funny
moments. Nonetheless, on balance I’m not the right viewer for this movie. You
might not be either.
Neighbors (1981) – Starring Dan
Aykroyd and John Belushi in their heyday, this film was not very well received
at the time of its release. Yet it has aged well. Off-beat, bizarre, and very
1980s, the whole thing has an undertow of appeal. Belushi is a quiet
suburbanite living with his family at the isolated end of a cul-de-sac that
backs up to a swamp. The new neighbors (Aykroyd and Cathy Moriarty) add a new
dimension to the word eccentric. Their weird and seemingly dangerous behavior
evokes paranoia in Belushi. They also apparently have an open relationship which
offers a challenge and temptation to Belushi and his lifestyle. If you like
your films a little bit odd, this qualifies. I definitely like it more now than
on first viewing in 1981.
** ** ** **
**
Visioneers (2008) – In a surreal
dystopia, George Washington Winsterhammerman (Zach Galifianakis) is a “tunt”
(drone) in the conglomerate Jeffers Corporation, which has risen to economic
dominance through the shallow philosophy of Mr. Jeffers. Even drones in this
productivity-minded future live in large beautiful homes, drive nice cars, and
have no shortage of material goods. Nonetheless, their jobs and lifestyles are
so dehumanizing that many literally explode. Efforts by the corporation and the
government to combat the epidemic of explosions only worsen matters.
The film has its moments, but even as a comedic
premise the notion that prosperity itself is dehumanizing is a little specious.
Visioneers was made before the Crash
of 2008 after which many folks would have risked explosion to be secure in
prosperity. At any level of wealth, life is as shallow as one chooses to make
it. However, the work environment depicted in Visioneers truly is dreadful and vision is precisely what Mr.
Jeffers lacks.
Daisies (1966) – Directed by Věra
Chytilová this surreal Czech film was banned in it its own country until 1975.
Two young women, both named Marie, apparently decide that the only reasonable
way to live in a corrupt world is to revel in the corruption. Whether this is
shallow, deep, or somehow both is hard to say. They indulge their appetites and
play pranks. They destroy a room where a sumptuous feast is laid out. They
survive a dunking but shouldn’t have played with the chandelier. Strange, but
intriguing.
** ** ** **
**
Divergent
(2013) – Yes, it’s another dystopia based on another YA novel series in
which another teen young woman is the hope for the future. Chicago is walled
off from the outside world and is run by five factions. Members of each
especially exhibit one of five virtues. 16-year-olds are tested to reveal their
biological predisposition toward one of the five. Those who exhibit a multitude
of predispositions are called “divergent” and are outcasts. In the movie it is
not clear whether the wall is to keep the Chicagoans in or others out. Is Chicago
a safe place or a prison? From the books by Veronica Roth (and presumably in
the upcoming movie sequels) we can learn that a number of cities have been
sealed off with the plan of undoing a genetic engineering program that went
wrong. Undoing the program requires creating divergents, i.e. normal human
beings, not eliminating them as the factions are doing. Beatrice (Shailene
Woodley) is a divergent; this fact shows up in her test, but her examiner is a
rebel who falsifies the result to protect her. Beatrice joins the Dauntless faction which
positions her to resist a power grab by the Erudite faction who would (among
other evils) hunt down the divergents.
The movie is not actually terrible, but if you’re
going to pick just one dystopia with a rebellious teen, stick with The Hunger Games.
Untamed Youth (1957) – There is no
doubt who is a prisoner in this teen exploitation flick. In a
rural area Judge Cecelia Steele is
secretly married to agricultural magnate Russ Tropp. She ensures he gets cheap
agricultural labor by convicting teens and passing travelers of minor offenses
and then sentencing them to work on Tropp’s farm. Penny (Mamie Van Doren) and
Jane (Lori Nelson) are convicted of skinny-dipping and hitchhiking, which puts
a crimp in their plan to enter show business. They are sent to the farm. The
judge’s son opts to work at the farm as a supervisor subordinate to Tropp, but doesn’t like what he sees –
except for Jane. He likes her. He and Jane hope to overthrow the corrupt
system, but will the judge side with sonny or hubby? Penny meanwhile sings
songs and looks busty. Untamed Youth
is trash, and I enjoyed it thoroughly.
** ** ** **
**
Horns (2013) – Though listed on IMDB
as 2013, Horns was released both to
theaters and pay-per-view only last month. Ig (Daniel Radcliffe) is falsely
accused of having murdered his girlfriend Merrin (Juno Temple) whom he has
loved since childhood. We see their relationship in flashbacks. Nearly the
whole town thinks he did it despite the insufficiency of evidence to charge him
with the crime. To his own dismay, Ig starts to grow horns. They have the
effect of causing people to tell him their darkest thoughts; people also do
what Ig tells them. They somehow forget the horns when they look away and
forget what they said and did while under their influence. He uses this ability
to discover what really happened that night. I don’t normally like movies with
supernatural elements, but this one was odd enough to be interesting.
D.O.A.
(1988) – This is a remake of a 1950 noir with Edmund O’Brien. The original
isn’t bad, but in this case I like the remake better. Dexter (Dennis Quaid) is
an English professor whose wife is divorcing him. After a night of far too much
alcohol, he wakes up in the dorm room of young co-ed Meg Ryan. He sneaks out
but feels worse than just hung-over, so he stops by the hospital and discovers
he has been poisoned irreversibly. On
top of this, he is falsely accused of having murdered his wife. He is then
accused of other murders. He has little time to discover the truth so he snares
Meg Ryan and retraces his steps the night he was poisoned. Surprisingly good.
** ** ** **
**
He Was a Quiet Man (2007) – The title
comes from the litany of comments we always seem to hear about a multiple
killer. You know them from journalists’ interviews with neighbors and
co-workers. We all do. “He was a quiet man. Very polite. He seemed so nice. He
always said ‘good morning’ to me. A bit of a loner.” And so on. Those words
describe Bob Maconel, perfectly played by Christian Slater. Bob is an office
worker with a dreary job and every reason to hate his co-workers and immediate
superiors. He is also schizophrenic and has conversations with his goldfish – they
answer back. Day after day he loads and unloads his gun at his cubicle, waiting
for the moment and the courage to kill his co-workers and himself; he exempts
Venessa from his intended targets because she has a nice smile. At the end of
one day exceptionally full of degrading treatment, he appears ready to follow
through as he loads his revolver. He drops a bullet and, as he reaches down for
it, shots are fired. Bodies drop to the floor. Another worker has gone postal
first. Venessa is among the shot, but is still alive. Bob empathizes with the
shooter, of course, and intervenes only because the fellow is about to finish
off Venessa. Bob kills the shooter and finds that he is a hero instead of the
dead villain he expected to be. When he visits Venessa in the hospital, though,
he finds that she has been left quadriplegic. She asks him to end her life. Bob
has to decide how to handle her request and his new notoriety. This is a
twisted tale and all too credible. Thumbs up.
Heathers (1988) – He Was a Quiet Man inevitably reminded
me of Heathers, a dark teen comedy
starring a much younger Christian Slater and Winona Ryder. Slater plays J.D.,
which are unsubtle initials even though this slang for juvenile delinquent was
20 years out of date by 1988. J.D. espouses a nihilistic might-is-right
philosophy, and assists the rise of Veronica (Ryder) in HS society by killing
off the cooler kids. He makes the murders look like suicides. J.D.’s
inclinations run in the family. J.D.’s father owns a demolition company, and it
is strongly implied that years earlier he had arranged a fatal accident on a
job site for J.D.’s mother. Veronica eventually has second thoughts about
murder for social advancement and breaks with J.D., but this just puts her in
his sights as he plans to blow up the high school. Also thumbs up: wicked,
funny, and classic 80s.
** ** ** **
**
Daisies
I haven't seen most of these. I don't know if I'd label Bukowski a snob, perhaps more of a misanthrope--but don't think that's any better. :) I haven't seen the particular movie you reviewed, but I have seen the foreign movie (Belgium, I think) Crazy Love, which I enjoyed, Barfly, which got pretty good critical reviews, but I wasn't quite as won over, and Born Into This a doc. It looks like there's another one I haven't seen: Tales of Ordinary Madness.
ReplyDeleteOn one hand I've always enjoyed Bukowski's poetry and writing, they at times have a full range of funny to sadness, to some kernel of truth. There's an underbelly there and a fair enough rough and tumble to it, rage, depression, and so forth. On the other hand, I have to separate his real life, like a lot of artist, from the real person. as I pretty much abhor being around a smoker (due to my allergies), and don't care for being around drunks either. I've known people like him, however, in my past, and they can be likeable people, not wishing so much for success or the general high minded ideals of a capitalistic society, but would just rather enjoy life, go their own way, and so forth.
I did enjoy Divergent, though agree I prefer, The Hunger Games, but I could watch the Divergent sequel. I guess it's a big enough market for both and more.
I figured I wouldn't enjoy the newest Neighbors, just not a Seth Rogan in general.
Curious about Horns though. Started the book, but never finished it, and should as it was pretty well written.
I'll have to catch The Philadelphia Story. Good reviews all though, you do it well.
Barfly and Factotum have much in common. Both have a literarily talented but otherwise broken protagonist along with damaged side characters. Both are very good films that aren't very pleasant.
DeleteI always find movies in which Juno Temple has a major part to be at least interesting. She chooses her scripts well. Even if ultimately I don't like one, I never regret having spent the time watching it. (Juno's forte is indie flicks; she shows up in big budget studio films too -- e.g. Maleficent -- but not in major parts.) Horns was no exception.
The Philadelphia Story is definitely worth a look. The contrast between the intelligent humor of this movie and the dumb comedy in Neighbors (and its ilk) hardly could be more stark. Traci Lords, by the way, chose her film name from Hepburn's character in this movie, as unlikely a source as that seems.
I'm glad you like the reviews.
That Daisies is one bizarro film :)
ReplyDeleteWow another great sweep of films. "Philadelphia Story" is one of those movies I had to be coaxed into watching, because it just didn't sound like my cup of Earl Grey. But man, it was great. The writing in that movie just crackles. Add the great cast and it can't lose. Added it to our DVD library after a single viewing.
ReplyDeleteThe 1981 "neighbors" sounded really intriguing. I love flicks from that era, so I'm kinda surprised I've never heard of it or seen it, especially with that cast.
Was on the fence about "Divergent", I think we'll stick with "The Hunger Games". But "Untamed Youth" I am familiar with. That's a fun one, and trashy for sure. MST3K tackled it in their first season, and they have a lot of fun with it. Not too hard of the film, and Joel and bots are very impress with Van Doren... who isn't. :)
"DOA" I had completely forgotten about that film. Very entertaining one as I remember. And finally "Heathers" is an 80s cult classic. Some very fun writing and performances in that one That is one of my wife's favorite films, and she will quote it from time to time.
DOA is one of those 80s neo-noirs that so often worked pretty well. And it is indeed the 80s: Meg dances to Billy Idol and the live band in the bar is Timbuk3.
DeleteI don’t suppose MST3K needed to do much with Untamed Youth which is funny as it is. It is played completely straight but the filmmakers nonetheless plainly are completely aware of its camp. Mamie had no problem with doing those 50s exploitation flicks (Girls Town, The Beat Generation, Vice Raid, etc.) that are such a gas. Popular in their day, they now are inexplicably largely forgotten.