The
first Kurt Vonnegut story I ever read was Cat’s
Cradle, a quirky apocalyptic novel published in 1963. I picked it off a
drugstore paperback bookrack during some summer month in 1966 or 1967. Cat’s Cradle is science fiction, more or
less, and I commonly read science fiction recreationally during my teens as I
still do today. It already had something of a cult status, but I wasn’t aware
of that back then, nor was I familiar with the author. I’m pretty sure I picked
it out based solely on the description on the cover. Thereafter, however, I did
make a point of seeking out Vonnegut, usually buying the hardcovers of his new
works rather than waiting for the paperbacks. As the 1960s closed, Vonnegut
tried his hand at drama. His play Happy
Birthday, Wanda June, starring Kevin McCarthy and Marsha Mason, opened at
the de Lys in New York on October 7, 1970 and closed March 14, 1971.
I was a
broke college freshman in Washington, DC, at the time, so I didn’t see it then,
but I did buy the book, which I have read with pleasure repeatedly since and still
own. There also was a 1971 movie starring Rod Steiger and Susannah York. It is
not uncommon for authors to hate movie adaptations of their work, sometimes
with cause and sometimes without; Stephen King famously disliked Stanley
Kubrick’s award-winning version of The
Shining, for instance. Vonnegut in the intro to Between Time and Timbuktu had this to say: “I might as well say
something about the filming of my play Happy
Birthday, Wanda June. It was one of the most embarrassing movies ever made,
and I am happy it sank like a stone.” In truth the movie isn’t as bad as all
that. It isn’t actually bad at all, though there is no denying that the script,
which repeatedly breaks the fourth wall, works far better as a play with a live
audience than on the screen. I was pleased to get a chance last Saturday (48
years late) finally to see it on an off-Broadway stage.
Harold
Ryan is a Hemingwayesque character: soldier, mercenary, hunter, and adventurer.
He has been lost in the rain forest for eight years in the company of Looseleaf
Harper, who dropped the bomb on Nagasaki. Harold is presumed dead, so his wife
Penelope (an obvious nod The Odyssey)
has been dating a vacuum cleaner salesman named Herb and the very pacifistic
Dr. Norbert Woodley. Both of them are despised by Paul, the son of Penelope and
Harold. It is Harold’s birthday, so, in an attempt to please Paul, Herb buys a
birthday cake even though it reads “Happy Birthday, Wanda June.” Wanda June is
a 9-year-old who was hit by an ice cream truck earlier that day, which is why
the cake was never picked up at the bakery. She provides some surreal narration
as do other deceased characters. Harold is not dead, and his sudden arrival
home creates an uproar. During his eight years in the forest a major cultural
shift has occurred with regard to sex. He is dismayed to find that his notion
of manliness is an atavism and that his wife is no longer the air-headed carhop
he married.
The
Wheelhouse production of this play currently at The Duke theater made some
directorial choices at variance with both the original production and the movie
including a different ending. In 1970 Kurt Vonnegut experimented with different
endings, so it is possible the Wheelhouse ending was one of them, but it is not
the ultimate one in 1971 or the one found in the published play. It is one that
puts Harold in a far worse light, which is in keeping with the Wheelhouse
choice to present him as animalistic (literally sniffing around) and crude to
point of pantomiming sex acts. McCarthy and Steiger in the role, by contrast,
made him gruff, blustery, and offensive, but not a comic book villain: villain,
yes, but not to such an extreme. Since Vonnegut remarked on his own inability
“to make Harold or anybody thoroughly vile,” I think McCarthy and Steiger had
it right. The point, after all, is that there is some appeal to Harold – he did
after all fight Nazis and explore the wild among other impressive things – even
though his time has passed to the point that he has (without changing) become a
villain. The 21st century tendency to portray opponents – not just
on stage but in real life – as not just wrong but evil might have influenced
the presentation of Harold as so much more detestable. That said, the play
still works, and I like everything else about the Wheelhouse presentation. The
surreal elements were handled well within the limits of the sets, and the small
cast was used creatively. All of the actors, including Jason O’Connell (Harold
Ryan), were enjoyable and effective. Vonnegut’s offbeat sensibility is as
captivating as ever and his dark humor still bites.
Despite
my reservations above, this is still very much a Thumbs Up review. It is worth
catching at The Duke during its final weeks. Happy Birthday, Wanda June is revived elsewhere around the country
from time to time as well, and I recommend not waiting 48 years to see it.
Introductory Scene from The
Wheelhouse Production of Happy Birthday,
Wanda June
I'm sure off-Broadway productions vary, but the one my brother and I attended was a eye-opening experience. It was much smaller than I had expected. It was fun, but I'm glad I didn't pay for the experience (at least that's how I recall it). We bumped into one of the players on Times Square and he gave us a free comp ticket.
ReplyDeleteVonnegut can generally be an interesting read. They published a bio on him some years back, which I've yet to read, but have always wanted too. I thought he and Brautigan had similar styles in some ways. Both at times kept their style simple (deceptively so), and both would sometimes delve into the surreal (for lack of better words). Oddly they looked similar.
Yes, your mileage definitely will vary off-Broadway -- or on Broadway for that matter. Free tickets are not usually an encouraging sign. Since even off-Broadway is a bit pricey these days (especially including tolls and parking) I tend to stick with favorite authors (e.g. GB Shaw revivals), plays that are offbeat in some intriguing way (e.g. a musical version of "Cruel Intentions"), or both (e.g. a musical version of "Macbeth").
DeleteI like both Brautigan and Vonnegut, too. Vonnegut is an easy read. He tossed in the occasional SAT word or obscure literary reference just to demonstrate, I think, that his style was a choice.