The earliest literature in
every culture is filled with gods, demigods, and mythical beasts doing
fantastic things and interacting for well or ill with ordinary mortals. Ovid’s Metamorphoses reads like an adult
superhero comic book. In time these characters largely were replaced in fiction with
mortals such as Don Quixote, Tom Jones, the gunslingers in dime novels of the
19th century, and the ray-gun wielding adventurers of 20th
century pulp science fiction. To be sure, many of the heroes of these stories
might be braver than you or I and more skilled with a sword or six-gun, but
they are not superhuman – not even the most fanciful of them. Flash Gordon is
just a guy with keys to a space ship. Yet, in the past 7 decades we have come
full circle. Movies (today’s prevailing form of fiction) populated by superheroes
dominate the box office. The superheroes are very much in the mold of classical
demigods. A few (e.g. Thor) actually are the old mythical gods.
This was brought to mind by a
movie and by Halloween. Last night with friends I watched Thor: Ragnarok. On this Halloween day amid the ghosts and goblins wandering
the streets are numerous superheroes of the DC and Marvel universes. Superhero
films are not my preferred genre; this is not snobbiness – I enjoy plenty of
much trashier and more lowbrow fare – but just personal inclination. These
films are so much a part of the culture, however, that I make some effort to
see the major ones. Thor: Ragnarok was
pretty good for its kind. The dialogue was clever. The characters could be
enjoyably petty and make missteps in the manner of flawed humans – and Chris
Hemsworth has his fans for reasons that are obvious.
The prototype of the modern
superhero and still the most iconic is, of course, Superman, who debuted in
Action Comics in June 1938. He appeared in a live action film serial in 1948,
but my first introduction to the character was on the TV series The Adventures of Superman starring
George Reeves that ran from 1952 through 1958. Reruns ran regularly from the
50s to the 80s and irregularly ever since. Naturally, I watched the show as a
kid and was as likely as anyone to tie on a towel as a cape and pretend to fly.
Seasons 2-6 were family-friendly with a vengeance in accordance with so much of
the 1950s backlash to 40s worldliness. But not Season 1. Even as a preteen I
noticed something different about Season 1 quite aside from it being black-and-white
and starring Phyllis Coates as Lois Lane. (Noel Neill had the part of Lois in
2-6.) I wasn’t precocious enough to put into words what the difference was, but
by my late teens I began to get an inkling. To this day, despite the show’s low
budget and the limitations of early TV, Season 1 (first aired in 1952 but shot
in 1951) remains my favorite depiction of the man of steel. The explanation
begins a decade earlier.
The 1940s were the
quintessential decade for American culture – all the good and bad in high
relief. At its best, 40s music is great and
its style is better. Ugly social attitudes, behaviors, and laws were rampant in
the US, and were on display in the movies. Yet, whenever 1940s scriptwriters
slowed down to think about something and then actually tried to make a moral
point, the point almost always is unexceptionable. They knew better, in other
words, and the war tested folks’ moral compass like nothing else could. There
was more. WW2 veteran and accomplished author Gore Vidal frequently asserted
that the Sexual Revolution (in all its aspects) usually attributed to the 60s
really took place in the 40s – the 50s largely undid it, but that is another
story. Vidal himself contributed his part, publishing the best-seller The
City and the Pillar in 1946. The sophistication shows in the movies of the
era even through the constraints of the Hays Code: particularly in 40s film noir. Adult cynicism permeated
the genre but not to the point of nihilism and not without gritty humor. Philip
Marlowe is apt to do the right thing (not the same as the legal thing) in the
end, after all, even though he doesn’t expect to change the world by it. The
culture seemed headed the right way in the 40s, even though in practice it had
far to go. Life seldom proceeds in a straight line, however, and the 50s took a
turn.
Lois tries to rescue a trapped miner by herself in defiance of safety rules |
While the modern superheroes have been around
for decades, until recently they have been a quirky minor genre on the screen. The
question remains why they are so popular today in a way that dwarfs all previous
time periods. There are entire books on that subject. (Try The Psychology of Superheroes: An Unauthorized Exploration by
Jennifer Canzoneri and Robin S. Rosenberg for a consideration of what motivates
the characters and why we care.) The abbreviated version of the consensus is
that at a time when few of us feel powerfully in control of our own destinies the fantasy of power is more appealing. Superheroes and their enemies also
paint our fears and concerns in broad palatable strokes: it is hard not to see
a proxy for partisan division in Captain
America: Civil War or for real existential threats in the ambitions of
Thanos. Then again, sometimes the appeal might be simpler. Maybe sometimes we
just like to tie a towel to our necks as a cape and pretend to fly.
The
Kinks – (Wish I Could Fly Like) Superman
I think one of the reasons super heroes have become so popular on the screen is that finally special effects have caught up with them enough to go along with their daring exploits. Sure they did some of that earlier, but they were pretty low budget--good enough for a child's imagination. But a lot of story had to be left up to the imagination.
ReplyDeleteI have the first season of Superman on DVD too. I always liked Noel Neill playing Lois though, I guess as she played in the majority of them.
Neill played Lois in the 1948 serial, too, so I guess it was like coming home again when she replaced Coates.
DeleteCGI has opened up a lot of new possible storylines, it is true. The 1978 Superman did pretty well with old school fx, but there were limits.