Monday, July 23, 2018

Leaving a Trace


The father/daughter dynamic is a tricky one in real life and almost as tricky to portray on film. Disclosure: I’m not a parent. Whether that makes it easier for me to observe such interactions dispassionately or impossible to grasp them emotionally, I cannot judge – maybe both are true.

There are, of course, many kinds of relationships; fathers are variously portrayed on the screen as over-protective, bewildered, tyrannical, aloof, doting, creepy, or absent. Daughters, among other possibilities, are rebellious, fawning, or manipulative. (Louis C.K.’s movie I Love You, Daddy [2017] about the last sort may never see general release, consigned as he is to the woodshed for reasons other than fatherhood.) Real relationships are combinations of all those characteristics and more. Few films are good at capturing them. Strangely, the series Buffy the Vampire Slayer, of all productions, did a pretty good job portraying the complexities in the relationship of Buffy and Giles (a father figure rather than biological dad) and, stranger yet, of Faith and the villain Mayor Wilkins. A rather more credible setting than vampire-infested Sunnydale, however, can be found in Debra Granik’s Leave No Trace, currently in theaters. The movie is based on the novel My Abandonment by Peter Rock, who was inspired by an actual news story from 2004 of a man found living in the woods with his daughter for years. Debra Granik and Anne Rossellini wrote the screenplay adaptation.


Some *spoilers*:
There are more than a few people who are unwilling or unable to live in “normal” society with its endless rules and requirements. To the extent possible they live on the fringe, actually preferring to fall through the cracks. One such man is Will (Ben Foster), a veteran with PTSD and a thousand-yard stare who feels at ease only in the forest away from all people except his 13-year-old daughter Tom (Thomasin McKenzie). They camp in Forest Park, a 5,200-acre tract in Portland, Oregon, and live almost entirely off the land. Their rare excursions into town are only so he can pick up his meds, sell them for cash to other (albeit less isolated) fringe-dwellers, and buy a few basic supplies. Will’s affection for Tom is deep and genuine as is hers for her father. A small mistake causes them to be spotted in the woods by authorities, which leads to their apprehension and separation; once authorities are convinced Tom isn’t abused, they are reunited in arranged housing, but the heavy bureaucratic hand of social services, however well meaning, is precisely the kind of control and human contact that he can’t stand. They pack up and head for the state of Washington where they again go into the deep woods, but Tom, who has had a taste of civilization, is not enthusiastic. She goes only out of love for her father. Will accidentally injures himself so Tom seeks help from residents of an RV park at the edge of the forest. By average standards, they, too, are fringe-dwellers, but by her standards their encampment is civilization. When Will is ready to head into the woods again, Tom no longer wants to join him; she chooses to remain with the RVs. “The same thing that is wrong with you isn’t wrong with me,” she correctly tells him. He doesn’t argue.

Will is portrayed sympathetically even when he makes plainly awful decisions. Will’s love for his daughter is real, and at no point does Tom even think to regard him as a villain, but of course he is. He may not be at fault for his problems, but he is at fault for making his 13-year-old daughter share them. We all make choices. We don’t always have good choices, but we always have some and they have consequences. He should have chosen something better for his daughter while choosing for her was still his responsibility. Love doesn’t make up for it. It counts, but it doesn’t override. Tom makes her own choice finally, which mirrors the choice all offspring make when they are ready to strike out on their own paths. 

Thumbs Up, but not for those who like only action movies.

Trailer – Leave No Trace

4 comments:

  1. Good review. I'd not heard of that movie, but I'll make a mental note and add to the Netflix queue. Too bad Louie misbehaved badly. There are just somethings you don't do and probably shouldn't say in public. His career could have been pretty big or bigger than what it was. Whether or not things of that nature can totally destroy a career is anyone's guess, but no matter who you are or what gender it's always good to remember the consequences.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Leave No Trace is a good movie, at least for viewers open to quiet drama. Re: Louis, it should be remembered that Louis CK’s creepy behavior (at least as so far reported) was in front of adults from whom he asked and received consent, but, yes, he still ought to have known that it would come back to bite him. His choices, like all choices, had consequences. His movie was shelved a few weeks before it had been scheduled for release, but the trailer still can be found; its final lines are ironic under the circumstances: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYs8CKkrp-Q.

      Delete
  2. Wow, never heard of this one either. Sounds intriguing. Ben Foster is usually pretty good and the role sounds like it suits him.

    He sounds less like a villain and more like an antagonist. I know that is splitting hairs really, but I usually make the distinction in cases like this. For these characters, their main issue is their inability to see beyond themselves.

    One of my favorites is from the anime Neon Genesis Evangelion. The antagonist is Gendou Ikari. He loved his wife deeply, and her death is the catalyst for all his actions. He treats his son like a means to an end, and the end is allowing Gendou to reunite with his wife. He doesn't care how many people he hurts, or how he mentally and spiritually destroys his son.

    And that is the horror of it. Gendou is selfish in the extreme. He is in pain over the death of his wife and he can't stand it. He never considers how his son might feel about any of it. All Gendou knows is pain and he wants it to stop.

    The series does a good job of slowly giving us hints about his motives over the course of the series. When we finally realize what he has done (essentially brought about the end of humanity as we know it) just so he can reunite with his wife, we realized how insane he really is. He says he does it because he loved her so much... but I would argue that he loved himself more.

    Anyway, great series. Need to give it a rewatch soon. :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's true that Will is not actively trying hurt anyone. He is just insensitive to the consequences of his actions. How oblivious one must be before the moral distinction is lost (if it ever is) from those causing harm by design is, I suppose, open to debate. Villains rarely regard themselves as such.

      Delete