DVDs continue to spin their way through my player from time
to time, so the moment again has arrived for mini-reviews: this time an even
ten, all of them deserving a thumbs up. Bad reviews we’ll leave to another day.
Ender's Game (2013)
I read Orson Scott Card’s well-regarded scifi novel Ender’s Game about 20 years ago. It was
no surprise that movie studios would bid for it despite the fx budget it
necessarily entailed. It is Harry Potter
in space (though Card’s novel preceded Rowling’s) with a large helping of Starship Troopers. The war against the
formics (hive creatures like giant ants) is directed much a like a video game,
though the casualties on both sides are real enough. Since kids are better
intuitive game-players than adults, kids are recruited and schooled to command
the action. Ender Wiggins (that’s a name) is the youngest of three gifted
siblings. His brother washed out of the program because he is sociopathic while
his sister washed out because she is too empathetic. Ender needs to balance the
two: to temper ruthlessness with the empathy needed to understand the
enemy.
The movie portrays the orbiting military school very well,
including the elaborate free-fall battle training area. Ender, though still a
kid, is older than in the book, partly (I presume) to broaden the audience
appeal, but also to sharpen the unexpressed but present sexual tension between
Ender and fellow cadet Petra. The moral crisis he faces at the end when the war
is carried to the formics’ home world is also properly chilling. A viewer is
better off having read the book first, but this isn’t essential. Ender’s Game may not be a new classic,
but it is solid SF. The novel Ender’s
Game is the first book of a tetralogy to which a fifth book may be added
later this year, fodder for movie sequels to come.
Short Term 12 (2013)
In this Sundance Award winner, a young (20s) staff of a
halfway house for troubled teens – an interim residential facility pending
permanent placement – try to keep order while counseling the residents. Two of
the adults poorly conceal their romantic liaison. Staff-member Grace relates
all too well to one of the girls, whose self-cutting over issues with her
father evokes Grace’s own past. This is a much better film than you might
expect, and Brie Larson is excellent as Grace.
Afternoon Delight
(2013)
I had mentioned this film after its brief theatrical run
last summer, but I rewatched it on a newly released DVD a few days ago, which
is enough of an excuse to mention it again, this time in a bit more depth.
The trailers represent this as a kind of light-hearted
romantic comedy, but it isn’t. As so often in Juno Temple movies, the script
doesn’t fit a neat category. Rachel (Kathryn Hahn) is a well-to-do suburban
mother with a committed upright husband (by no means perfect, but who is?), a
healthy normal pre-school son, and a beautiful house in a nice neighborhood.
She is aware intellectually that her problems are First World ones. She feels
guilty enough about her privilege, in fact, that she involves herself in
countless do-gooder events and fundraisers with her neighbors. (None of these
are of a sort that possibly could raise significant amounts of money, so they
have more than a little social pretense to them – a way of showing off one’s
“giving back.”) This intellectual awareness of her advantages doesn’t prevent
her from being unhappy anyway. “Is that all there is?” (to steal a line from
Peggy Lee) is the gist of it. Despite the trailer’s insinuation that Rachel’s
husband Jeff (Josh Radnor) is the one who is disinterested, it is Rachel who
has deflected sex for the past six months; she would like to feel amorous, she
tells her therapist (Jane Lynch), but she doesn’t have any enthusiasm for it.
On the advice of her girlfriends, Rachel takes her husband
to a strip club, where he buys her a private lap dance from a free-spirited
dancer/hooker named McKenna (Juno Temple). Later, Rachel encounters McKenna
outside the club at a coffee vendor. Unlike Rachel, McKenna
seems quite happy with her life. When McKenna needs a new place to stay, Rachel,
for complex reasons, invites her into her home as a nanny despite the
reservations of Jeff. McKenna still services her favorite tricks on the side,
however; Rachel accompanies McKenna on one occasion as the observer for an
older (perhaps not outright ugly, but certainly unhandsome) client who likes it
when someone watches – creepy as this sounds, he is surprisingly gentlemanly about
the whole thing. Rachel is very disturbed by the experience. McKenna is an
unexceptionable nanny until a neighbor (unaware of McKenna’s side job) asks to
borrow her as a babysitter one night, and Rachel nixes the idea as
inappropriate. McKenna, quietly offended, retaliates by behaving as precisely
the untrustworthy tramp Rachel has just treated her as being. A marital crisis
ensues, but at the end of it Rachel feels (as well as knows) just how fortunate
she is in life, and for that matter so does Jeff. She even likes sex again.
This movie gets very mixed user-reviews (Quentin Tarantino
praised it), but I think much of the problem was the way it was marketed. It’s
not the movie most viewers expected – or wanted. Nonetheless, I give it a
thumbs up.
Bound (1993)
Mobster girlfriend Violet (Jennifer Tilly) and visiting
plumber Corky (Gina Gershon) find affection in each other’s arms. They plot to
betray Violet’s boyfriend Caesar by stealing millions of mob money while
scapegoating Caesar for the theft. Is there a male-bashing subtext here? A
sense that the mobsters are despicable as much for being guys as for being
crooks? Yeah, some. But it doesn’t matter. The film is well plotted, the
villains truly villainous, and the actors on their marks. I surely was rooting
for Violet and Corky to give the criminals their comeuppance (even though the
two ladies aren’t exactly honest themselves), to get away with the cash, and to
live happily ever after. Definitely worth a look.
Red (2008)
This is not the Bruce Willis movie of the same name.
When I was young the country was full of older men with
stern values but a willingness to give second chances – the sort who, if you
played a prank, would make you work as punishment but then would pay you for
what you did. My father fit the description. My dad was a builder, and one time
when I was a kid some neighborhood teens slashed tires on construction
equipment on one of his sites. Even then the damage was $800, which would be
thousands of dollars today. They were spotted by an adult and their names
reported to my dad. Today, teens vandalizing a job site this way almost
certainly would be reported to the police and charged with a crime – “zero
tolerance” and all that. Back then, my dad called their fathers. He didn’t want
their parents to pay for the tires; he wanted the boys to pay for them themselves
from summer jobs. They did, too, and their parents backed my dad up. No police
ever were involved and he shook the hand of each of the boys when he had finished
paying off his share of the damage.
Men with this perspective are far rarer today, but some are
still out there. In Red, one such older
man named Avery, played by Brian Cox, has an old dog named Red. While he is
fishing, three teens come upon him in the woods. They try to rob him, but he
has nothing of value, so, in annoyance, a teen named Danny shoots Red. Avery
finds out who the shooter is (from the local gunshop owner) and goes to meet
the boy’s father. All he wants is for Danny to acknowledge what he did and to
express remorse. Instead, Danny smugly denies everything and his father – a
completely amoral wheeler-dealer who surely believes Avery but doesn’t care so
long as he can’t prove it – throws Avery out. Another of the teens is Danny’s
brother, who is remorseful but too scared of Danny and dad to cross them. The
working-class parents of the third teen are just as unhelpful. Meantime, we
learn of some terrible things in Avery’s recent past that explain much of his
current behavior.
Since this movie is based on a Jack Ketchum novel, we know
things will escalate into bloodshed. Avery persists in pressing the point. He
never initiates violence but when threatened with it he stands his ground. It
all culminates in an ending that is disturbing and satisfying – and disturbing
that it is satisfying.
Paper Man (2009)
In a gender-reversed parallel to Afternoon Delight, gifted but commercially unsuccessful author
Richard (ahem), played by Jeff Daniels, has pretty much everything he needs in
a material way. His wife Claire (Lisa Kudrow) is a successful surgeon who
brings home more than enough cash. Yet, Richard is troubled. Also, he is facing
a deadline, which a serious case of writer’s block makes him likely to miss. Oh
yes, he still has (and frequently interacts with) his imaginary friend from
childhood, Captain Excellent, played by Ryan Reynolds in superhero costume. If
that were the least of his quirks, he would be almost normal.
Richard tries to break his writer’s block by staying by
himself off season in Montauk while his wife spends weekdays in NYC. In Montauk
he strikes up an unlikely May-December friendship with teenager Abby (Emma
Stone) who has troubles and quirks of her own. A mutually beneficial friendship
is really all it is, though naturally Claire has a hard time seeing it that
way.
This is a talky film without a lot of action, but the talk
is well-scripted. If you don’t mind a flick about oddball people getting past
their personal demons, you might like this.
Small Apartments
(2012)
With an ensemble cast including Billy Crystal, James Caan,
Johnny Knoxville, Juno Temple, and Dolph Lundgren, among others, this odd but
likable film follows the interactions of several residents of a seedy Los
Angeles apartment building. The most central character is Franklin Franklin
(Matt Lucas), a marginally functional misfit with a brother in a mental
institution; Franklin Franklin has just killed his landlord and dreams of
moving to Switzerland. Billy Crystal is the investigator who by the end has
pieced together events, but nonetheless hopes Franklin gets away free. So do
we.
Wishful Drinking
(2010)
In 2009 Carrie Fisher’s one woman show opened at Studio 54
on Broadway. Based on Carrie’s autobiography of the same title, the show exposed
growing up in Hollywood (as the child of Eddie Fisher and Debbie Reynolds), her
life as a Star Wars princess, her
various relationships (including with Paul Simon), and her struggles with
mental illness. Carrie pulled it off with wit and humor. HBO recorded one of
the shows, which it aired in 2010 and released on DVD the next year. This
intelligent, funny, and informative look into one corner of celebrity culture
is thoroughly enjoyable.
Rush (2013)
In the 1970s, there was a much ballyhooed rivalry between
British driver James Hunt and Austrian Niki Lauda on the Formula One racing
circuit. James was flamboyant, uneven, but occasionally brilliant on and off
the track. Niki approached the sport and life with Germanic regularity and thoroughness.
In 1976 they faced off as frontrunners for the championship. Hunt’s team faced disqualification
issues over F1 rules, and Lauda, far more seriously, was severely injured in a
crash. Yet both continued to drive. This film adaptation, directed by Ron
Howard, is surprisingly engaging, even for those who care little about racing.
It also proves that Chris Hemsworth can do far more on screen than swing around
Thor’s hammer.
Dakota Skye (2008)
Dakota is a recent HS graduate who has a superpower: she not
only knows when people lie to her but sees the truth as subtitles. This has its
plusses and minuses. She meets a young man who never displays any subtitles. Is
he some rare duck who really doesn’t lie, or is he her kryptonite: the one
person on whom her powers don’t work? She suspects the latter when she catches
him in an apparent lie. This throws her since she never had to deal with
uncertainty before. She breaks up with him over it. Things complicate further
when she later discovers that from his perspective he might have told the
truth. I would have opted for another resolution to the plot, but nonetheless
the movie isn’t bad.
Well, more than one of us has been tripped up by the often subjective
nature of truth, as those who point thumbs a different direction on any of
these flicks can attest.
Thanks for the reviews. I've only heard of a few of these. I was curious about "Enders Game". I read the book a few years a ago and really enjoyed it. I figured a good movie could be made from it, but after I heard about the development hell it had gone through I was a little wary.
ReplyDelete"Rush" looked really good. Ron Howard usually makes very entertaining film. I'm not a fan of racing, but the trailers made this one look like a solid pick.
"Bound" is a blast. I haven't seen it in years, but I remember really enjoying it. Watching it now, could you tell it was made by the same directors who tackled "The Matrix" trilogy and "Speed Racer"?
"Ender's Game" easily could have been a disaster, but it came off quite well.
DeleteI hadn't paid attention to the credits on "Bound" actually, and didn't notice the directors. Thanks for mentioning it. I wouldn't have guessed, but I can see some parallels in the villains.
Several of these are of the modest budget indie type, but none is a waste of time.